Skip to main content
Landmark Legislation2010Passed

Proposition 14

California's Top-Two Nonpartisan Primary

IVP authored the ballot measure that replaced California's closed partisan primaries with a nonpartisan Top Two system — giving every voter access to every candidate on a single ballot.

40M
voters now in an open primary
2010
placed on ballot & passed
#1
most significant CA election reform
3
legal challenges — all defended
The Problem

California's primaries used to serve the parties, not the voters.

Before 2010, California ran a closed partisan primary system. If you were registered as an independent — no party preference — you were effectively locked out of the most consequential stage of the election. In many districts, the primary was the only election that mattered because general elections were predetermined by partisan gerrymandering.

The result was a system where roughly 5 million independent voters in California had no meaningful voice in choosing their representatives. Candidates only had to appeal to their partisan base, producing some of the most polarized legislatures in the country.

IVP's response was Proposition 14 — a ballot measure that fundamentally restructured how California runs primary elections. Instead of separate party primaries, all candidates would appear on a single ballot regardless of party affiliation, and all registered voters could participate. The top two vote-getters would advance to the general election.

The Solution

Author it. Pass it. Defend it.

IVP didn't just advocate for Proposition 14 — IVP authored it. Working with a bipartisan coalition of reformers, IVP crafted the ballot language, built the legal framework, and drove the effort that would put it before California voters.

The opposition was immediate and fierce. Both major parties fought the measure, joined by third-party organizations who argued it would eliminate their candidates from general election ballots. Despite that opposition, California voters passed Proposition 14 in the June 2010 primary election.

But passing the ballot measure was only the beginning. Partisan interests immediately filed federal lawsuits to overturn the results. IVP anticipated this and had already prepared the constitutional defense — launching a multi-year legal effort that would culminate in three landmark federal court victories.

Quick Facts
TypeBallot Measure
Filed2009
PassedJune 8, 2010
Effective2012 Primary
JurisdictionCalifornia
AuthorIVP
Vote54% Yes
Related Reforms
Open Primaries for Every VoterMore Choice Voting
Timeline

The Road to Reform

2009

Proposition 14 Filed

IVP authors and files the ballot measure to establish a nonpartisan Top Two primary system for all California state and congressional elections.

June 2010

Passed by California Voters

Despite organized opposition from both major parties and third-party organizations, Proposition 14 passes with 54% of the vote.

2011

First Legal Challenge Filed

Partisan interests file suit in federal court to overturn Proposition 14, arguing it violates party association rights. IVP leads the legal defense.

June 2012

First Top Two Primary Election Held

California holds its first nonpartisan primary under Proposition 14. All voters — including 5+ million independents — participate on a single ballot.

2012

Boden v. Secretary of State — Won

The federal court upholds Proposition 14's constitutionality, establishing precedent that states can adopt nonpartisan primary reforms.

2014

Rubin v. Bowen — Won

A second federal challenge is defeated. The court rules that voter participation rights outweigh partisan ballot access claims.

Present

Nearly 40 Million Voters Protected

Proposition 14 remains the most significant structural election reform in modern California history. The legal precedent IVP established now serves as a framework for reform efforts nationwide.

What Proposition 14 Changed

Nearly 40 million Californians now participate in a primary system that doesn't require party membership.

1

Every Voter, One Ballot

All registered voters — regardless of party affiliation — participate in the same primary on the same ballot.

2

Competitive General Elections

By advancing the top two candidates, districts that were once uncontested now have meaningful general election races.

3

Constitutional Precedent

Three federal court victories established durable legal precedent that other states can build on for nonpartisan primary reform.

4

National Blueprint

Proposition 14 created the legal and political playbook now being used to advance open primary reforms across the country.

When every voter has a voice in every election, candidates have to earn their support from the broadest possible electorate — not just their partisan base. That's what Proposition 14 delivered.

Independent Voter Project
Continue Reading

Related Cases

Federal Court Defense2012Success

Boden v. Secretary of State

After Proposition 14 passed, partisan interests immediately challenged it in federal court. IVP led the legal defense to protect the nonpartisan primary from being struck down.

Read the Full Case
Impact & Precedent

The court upheld the constitutionality of the Top Two system, establishing legal precedent that states can adopt nonpartisan primary reforms without violating party association rights.

Federal Court Defense2014Success

Rubin v. Bowen

A second federal challenge targeted the Top Two primary, arguing it unconstitutionally burdened minor parties' access to the general election ballot. The court ruled that voter participation rights outweigh partisan ballot access claims.

Read the Full Case
Impact & Precedent

The ruling reinforced that the Top Two primary serves a compelling state interest in opening elections and that the rights of voters to participate outweigh partisan ballot access claims.

Voter Rights Litigation2019Writ Filed to SCOTUS

Boydston v. Padilla

IVP challenged the state of California over the exclusion of independent voters from presidential primaries — arguing that taxpayer-funded elections must be open to all taxpayers.

Read the Full Case
Impact & Precedent

The court deferred to party autonomy for presidential primaries, and SCOTUS denied certiorari in October 2023 (144 S.Ct. 496). The case raised national awareness of the contradiction: voters fund elections they can't vote in.

Support the Work

Every reform starts with someone writing the law.

IVP authors ballot measures, qualifies them, and defends them in court. Your donation funds the next initiative: from draft language to the ballot box.