End Super PACs
74.9% of Maine voters said yes to capping Super PAC donations at $5,000. Now we're defending that law in court — and building the legal framework to take the fight to all 50 states.
Sign the Petition
Add your name to the national movement for end super pacs.
Help us reach 10,000, and we're 52% of the way there!
Sign with us — your voice counts.
Unlimited money drowns out the voice of ordinary voters.
Since Citizens United, Super PACs have spent billions to influence elections — with no limits on how much a single donor can contribute. The result is a system where a handful of wealthy donors have more influence over who gets elected than millions of ordinary voters.
Super PACs don't just distort elections — they distort governance. Elected officials know who funded their victory, and they govern accordingly. The public interest takes a back seat to donor priorities.
Maine voters decided to fight back. In 2023, they passed Question 1 with nearly 3-to-1 support, capping Super PAC donations at $5,000 — one of the strongest political spending reform mandates in the country.
Cap Super PAC donations. Let voters compete with money.
Maine's Question 1 proved that voters overwhelmingly support common-sense limits on Super PAC spending. A $5,000 cap doesn't eliminate political speech. It levels the playing field so ordinary voters and small donors aren't drowned out by unlimited corporate and billionaire contributions.
FIVE (the Foundation for Independent Voter Education) is actively defending Maine's law in court against legal challenges from opposition groups. A win would set precedent for Super PAC contribution limits nationwide.
“When unlimited money floods elections, voters lose. Maine said enough.”
—FIVE
Sign the Petition
Add your name to the national petition for end super pacs.
5,217 signed
Help spread the word about end super pacs.
Independent reporting on primary reform, voter rights, and election accountability.
Visit IVN →We don't just talk about reform. We write it into law.
IVP and FIVE have a proven track record of passing reform and defending it in court. The effort to end unlimited Super PAC spending builds on the same strategy that delivered California's nonpartisan primary.
Maine's Question 1 — 74.9% support
One of the strongest reform mandates in the country. Now in court.
Active legal defense
FIVE is defending the law against challenges from opposition groups.
Precedent-setting potential
A win could establish the legal framework for Super PAC limits in every state.
Part of the bigger picture
Open primaries + more choices + less money = elections that serve voters.
If unlimited money stays, voters stay silent.
Every election cycle that passes without political spending reform is another cycle where the biggest donors have the biggest voice. Super PACs don't just influence elections. They shape who runs, who wins, and who governs.
Maine showed that voters want change. The question is whether the legal system will let them have it.
Maine Led the Way
74.9% of voters passed Question 1 — one of the strongest reform mandates in the country. FIVE is now defending that law in court, building the precedent for nationwide Super PAC limits.
Ready to help fix the system?
Add your name to the national petition for end super pacs. Or donate to fund legal action and grassroots reforms.